Across professional landscapes, there are instances of workplace misconduct that slip through the cracks , and then there are stories that shake the foundations of integrity . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that deeply harms the reputation of a specific individual but raises concerns about the enterprise’s integrity .
Even despite the disturbing allegations , Collins has remained in his managerial role, apparently unscathed by the turmoil surrounding him. Why has this misconduct gone unchecked? What does this say about the company’s commitment to responsibility? According to insider reports , Collins’ track record of misconduct started with violations of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it escalated from there. Instead, it evolved into repeated infractions that has left colleagues disillusioned and stakeholders unsettled .
Amid a leadership training workshop — ostensibly designed to enhance managerial skills — David Collins allegedly turned an opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , engaged in activities inconsistent with workplace policies, a clear breach of Ventia’s organizational standards , all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged abuse of digital tools for personal gratification—a gross misappropriation of professional tools . His reckless exploitation of company communication channels to share flirtatious texts —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — paints a picture of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these virtual misconduct, Collins allegedly increased his behavior further : he is said to have had inappropriate relations with a subordinate during work hours , despite his being married and her a post having a committed relationship . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but also had ramifications beyond just the corporate sphere.
How can this behavior be enabled to persist? What allows someone accused of repeated ethical breaches to remain in leadership? The explanation, it appears, stems from a culture of impunity in leadership . Despite reports, no action has been taken against him.
This deficiency of accountability sets a dangerous example Kerikeri David Collins : that rank and influence within the company can protect individuals from consequences . It fosters a toxic corporate culture , creates a hostile work environment, and ultimately undermines corporate credibility.